The government was shut down when
Red Baron visited Washington the other day. Many people told me that the reason for the shutdown was that members of the Tea Party were willing to vote on the US budget only if President Obama agreed to curtail the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's expenditure. I do not understand American politics well, but the introduction of the German health insurance system in 1881 was highly political too.
Following the first unification of Germany in 1871, the economic boom of the
Gründerzeit (the period when many industrial firms were founded in Germany) based on accelerated industrialization created a few wealthy industrialists and a growing proletariat. By articulating the misery of the industrial workers, the Social Democrat Party became a political power.
|
Bismarck at his desk (©Wikipedia) |
Chancellor Bismarck was not pleased and convinced the other parties in the
Reichstag to pass the
Gesetz gegen die gemeingefährlichen Bestrebungen der Sozialdemokratie (Law against efforts of the Social Democrats that were dangerous to the public) in 1878.
Although the Social Democrats remained outlawed as an organization until 1890, its members continued their agitation and successfully stood for elections to the Reichstag and state parliaments as private candidates.
Bismarck, the ancestor of all Realpolitikers (political realists), well saw that "to take the wind out of the socialists' sails," social improvements for the working proletariat were necessary. By then, 84 years old, he convinced Kaiser Wilhelm to send an Imperial Message to the Reichstag (parliament) on November 17, 1881. The legislature shall pass laws covering the workers financially in medical treatment cases, workplace accidents, invalidity, and old age.
The Krankenversicherung der Arbeiter (Law concerning workers' health insurance) came into force on December 1,1884, once the necessary infrastructure of statutory health insurance funds (Orts-, Betriebs-, and Innungskrankenkassen) had been set up. Accident insurance followed in 1885, the old-age and invalidity insurance was introduced in 1891.
The so-called gesetzliche Krankenversicherung (statutory health insurance) became compulsory for workers with an annual income of fewer than 2000 marks. The premium in 1885 was 1.92% of the revenue, of which the employee paid 2/3 and the employer 1/3.
By 1920 the contribution was 4.5%, in 1950 6%, in 1990 12.53%, and is now 15.5%, with the employee paying 8.2% of his basic salary and the employer covering 7.3% of the premium. The income threshold in 2013 was 55,000 euros per year. Presently 89% of the German population is covered by statutory health insurance; the others are privately insured. This has only been true since 2009, when health insurance became compulsory for all Germans. Thus, those who earn more than the income threshold and are not entitled to statutory health insurance must take out a private one. To this end, private health insurance companies must offer entry contracts that provide the same benefits as statuary health insurance. This sounds rather complicated, but the sticking point is different.
You surely noticed the increase in the premium and the income threshold for Germany's statutory health insurance system. In the past, many governments tried to cap medical care costs in vain. Doctors use more sophisticated methods, prescribe new expensive drugs, and employ costly diagnostic tools that must be amortized. The positive effect is that we are all getting older than our grandparents; the negative impact is a steady cost increase without a brake.
The best measure of limiting the costs in Germany was a reduction in the number of annual visits to the doctor. This was accomplished by introducing a
Praxisgebühr, some sort of entrance fee to the doctor's office. All patients with statutory health insurance must pay 10 euros per quarter in cash and at the counter. Before
they were voted out of the Bundestag (parliament) in the last gasp, the Liberals had the rather bureaucratic
Praxisgebühr abolished on January 1, 2013. Since then, the number of visits to the doctor has already increased by 5%.
I read figures that Obamacare will charge the US budget $940 billion over the next 10 years. Higher taxes should finance $400 billion, whereas greater efficiency in Medicare should pay for $483 billion. You may read in Wikipedia:
A 2011 comprehensive Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimate projected a net deficit reduction of the US budget of more than $200 billion during the 2012–2021 period: it calculated the law would result in $604 billion in total outlays offset by $813 billion in total receipts, resulting in a $210 billion net reduction in the deficit. The CBO separately noted that while most of the spending provisions do not begin until 2014, revenue will still exceed spending in those subsequent years. This argumentation is illustrated in the following chart.
|
©Wikipedia |
All these estimations are full of uncertainties and are based on figures from 2010 and 2011. Note the difference between 2010 and 2011, with the latter estimate being significantly higher in the following years, and who knows what the situation will be beyond 2017? Does the chart underline that healthcare costs will have only one direction: going up?
*