When Red Baron visited
Hamburg in April during Passion Week, our group had a guided tour of Hamburg's art gallery. In the meantime, I
blogged about other topics but never forgot to finish my Hamburg trilogy.
When
I was in Hamburg in the past, I visited the new sections on contemporary art
housed in a newly constructed annex or saw
special exhibitions at the Kunsthalle.
This time an art historian guided us through the original part of
the
Kunsthalle. I was impressed because the charming lady concentrated
her explanations on a few objects instead of showing us as many paintings as
possible.
We started with a giant painting (520 × 952 cm) from 1878, "
Der Einzug Karls V. in Antwerpen im Jahre 1520"
(Entry of Charles V into Antwerp in 1520) by Austrian painter
Hans Makart. The painter drew his inspiration from real entries in the diary of
Albrecht Dürer, who witnessed the event on his trip to the Netherlands. (Enlarge by
clicking the picture and try to find Dürer.) The style is called Salon
Painting, named after the Salon in Paris, where painters presented works of
art that corresponded to the taste of the Parisian ruling class. With historic
and literary-mythological themes, the artists adapted in content and style.
Following this Bing bang, we continued with more serious business. We saw
Caspar David Friedrich's Romantic painting, "
The Sea of Ice."
Critics see Friedrich's exploration of the theme of shipwrecks as an allegory
of the failure of Germany's striving for unity in the political environment of
the Restoration. A more concrete reference would be the North Pole
expeditions, which came to public attention at the beginning of the 19th
century. Some knowledgeable people interpret the painting of Das
Eismeer
against the background of the artist's personal setbacks.
When the
winters were colder in Europe, Friedrich sketched ice floes piled up near
Dresden on the Elbe River, but here the eternal ice of the Arctic is meant, in
which the failed ship signifies the powerlessness and transience of man.
Friedrich
once said, "The painter should not merely paint what he sees before him, but
also what he sees within himself. But if he sees nothing in himself, he should
also refrain from painting what he sees in front of him."
|
On the admission ticket: An alienated wanderer.
|
Why didn't the art historian present us with Friedrich's best-known Romantic
masterpiece Wanderer above the Sea of Fog? The reason was simple:
Here is another wanderer watching Wind Turbines above the Sea of Fog:
|
As found on Facebook
|
Next was "The Hülsenbeck Children," painted in 1805–06 by the German Romantic
painter
Philippe Otto Runge.
The painting presents three stages of childhood development where the siblings
play in front of a fence in the open air. They are free and not confined or
enclosed.
The youngest child blindly clutches a sunflower leaf while he opens
his eyes in amazement. The older one has grasped the handle of the drawbar
and energetically swings his whip, while the girl already shows herself
responsible and gives a sign to the little one with her right hand.
And here comes one of my favorite impressionists,
Max Liebermann, with a self-portrait.
Over almost forty years - until the
outbreak of the First World War - Liebermann spent nearly every summer in
the Netherlands. In his eyes, the simple life of the rural population and
their close-to-nature, still unalienated existence left a lasting impression
on the Berlin city dweller.
In addition, the impressive experience of the vast flat landscape
speaks in all clarity from his large-format early main work, "The Net
Mending Women," painted 1887/1889.
|
Pierre-Auguste Renoir: Riding in the Bois de Boulogne 1873
|
From 1890 on, Liebermann transited from Realism to Impressionism, a style
practiced in France already 15 years earlier.
|
Under the Tents 1900
|
Like Renoir, for Liebermann, bourgeois leisure activities became the
defining repertoire of his painting, although on a lower level, like the
beer garden in Leyden.
Liebermann's artistic path was also shaped by his friendship with the first
director of the Hamburger Kunsthalle,
Alfred Lichtwark. In 1889 Lichtwark established the department "Collection of Pictures from
Hamburg." He commissioned representatives of the avant-garde to paint motifs
from Hamburg and its surroundings.
Liebermann contributed to the Collection "Evening at the Ulenhorster
Fährhaus" in 1910 following Lichtwark's idea using familiar motifs to
sensitize the public to modern art, i.e., Impressionism.
In their homeland, the three giants of German Impressionism, Max
Liebermann,
Max Slevogt, and
Lovis Corinth, were known as
Dreigestirn (triple star or officially translated
triumvirate).
Here is a stamp commemorating Max Slevogt.
|
Charlotte Corinth at her Dressing Table 1911
|
The last painting we saw during our guided tour was
Charlotte Berend-Corinth at her Dressing Table. She was a painter herself and Lovis Corinth's
wife. Once again and spontaneously, Lovis paid homage to her beauty, this
time in a bright room against the light of a large window producing subtle
shades of turquoise, blue, and white.
This painting follows the general subject of "Woman at the Toilet,"
characterized by the depiction of a lightly dressed beauty in an interior,
sitting in front of a mirror and devoting herself to her appearance.
We
were at the end, but Red Baron continued to explore the adjacent rooms with
German expressionists in droves.
And here we go again with "Woman at the Toilet," although the earliest
expressionistic painting in the
Kunsthalle is from 1903.
While our Dreigestirn Liebermann, Slevogt, and Corinth still indulged in late
Impressionism,
Paula Modersohn-Becker
painted Mother and Child in
expressionistic style as early as 1903.
And here are two "geometrical" painters from the Bauhaus:
With some time left, I returned to the room with historical scenes, for Red
Baron likes historical paintings.
|
Anton von Werner, Graf Moltke in His Study in Versailles, 1872
|
Anton von Werner, the famous painter of the Proclamation of the German Kaiser in
Versailles, observed Field Marshall
Helmuth von Moltke
enjoying his stay in France.
Here is a piece of unsolved English history:
After the death of the English King Edward IV, his brother
Richard had the king's sons, the two princes, Edward V, already crowned
king at the age of twelve, and Richard of Shrewsbury, nine years
old, locked up in the Tower of London. Without further ado, Richard had
declared his nephews illegitimate and ascended the throne himself in June 1483
as Richard III. The two princes were last seen in the summer of 1483. Were
they murdered? This keeps the British guessing to this day. Since then, Richard's
reputation as a power-hungry, brutal villain precedes him, particularly when
William Shakespeare added fuel to the legend. In his most popular drama
"Richard III, " he called him a "hunchbacked poisonous toad." In
the plot, Richard III becomes a ruthless, murderous uncle who commits all
kinds of atrocities.
Were the princes murdered? Red Baron once saw a movie where the two brothers drowned in a barrel of red wine.
So far, the Church of England, with the support of Queen Elizabeth II, refused to grant permission to test the bones found in the Tower of London. Other reports refer to remains thought to be those of Princes Edward and Richard that are currently buried in Westminster Abbey. There are rumors that King Charles may authorize a forensic investigation being on the record as stating that he would be interested in solving the mystery.
*